
January 7, 2019
Getting Smart about America’s Middle East Policy
By Michael DoranAs a strategic concept, defeating the Iranian-led order plays to America’s strengths, serves its vital interests, and is poised to attract the support of its traditional allies.
I deeply appreciate the generosity of Elliott Abrams, Martin Kramer, and Steven Cook in providing thoughtful responses to “The Strategy Washington Is Pursuing in the Middle East Is the Only Strategy Worth Pursuing.” I’ll offer my reactions to their arguments—with each of which I respectfully disagree—one by one.
In my essay, I describe what I see as a coherent strategy toward the Middle East taking shape in the Trump administration. Elliott Abrams, for his part, sees no common worldview or sense of collective purpose at all. “[T]he decisions of the past two years,” he writes,
may instead reflect the many individuals who have affected decision-making (Rex Tillerson, John Kelly, James Mattis, John Bolton, Mike Pompeo, and for that matter Mohammed bin Salman, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Benjamin Netanyahu, etc.), not to mention the president’s own changes of mind.
Responses to January ’s Essay
January 2019
Middle East Strategy? What Middle East Strategy?
By Elliott AbramsJanuary 2019
Is the American Withdrawal from Syria a Disaster, or an Opportunity, or Something Else?
By Martin KramerJanuary 2019
Why Turkey Is No Partner for the United States
By Steven A. CookJanuary 2019
Getting Smart about America’s Middle East Policy
By Michael Doran