In Its Latest Capitulation, the U.S. May Stop Sanctioning Iran for Its Support of Terror
The list of concessions grows longer and more embarrassing.
June 29, 2015
The list of concessions grows longer and more embarrassing.
Since nuclear negotiations between Iran and the U.S. began, the White House has insisted on “decoupling” the issue of atomic weapons from Tehran’s support for terrorism, attacks on American soldiers in Iraq, and meddling in Afghanistan, Syria, and elsewhere. Now, writes Stephen Hayes, the administration has reversed this stance, and—as with so many others—not for the better:
The list of concessions grows longer and more embarrassing.
Contrary to a spurious opinion piece in the New York Times.
"I am as pro-Palestinian as I am pro-Zionist."
"Censorship cannot kill a bad idea."
Israel’s new status as a budding energy power.
Since nuclear negotiations between Iran and the U.S. began, the White House has insisted on “decoupling” the issue of atomic weapons from Tehran’s support for terrorism, attacks on American soldiers in Iraq, and meddling in Afghanistan, Syria, and elsewhere. Now, writes Stephen Hayes, the administration has reversed this stance, and—as with so many others—not for the better:
Unlock the most serious Jewish, Zionist, and American thinking.
Subscribe Now