Why Israeli Arabs Should Drop Their Political Parties
A choice between embracing and rejecting modernity.
September 20, 2017
A “mind-boggling” ruling.
The Israeli supreme court recently ruled on a case involving four Palestinian residents of eastern Jerusalem who in 2006 took positions in the Palestinian government on behalf of the Change and Reform party: an organ of Hamas. As they are not Israeli citizens—east Jerusalemites have a special status—the government responded by revoking their residency rights. The four appealed the decision to the courts and now, after nearly a decade, the highest court has ruled in their favor. Evelyn Gordon finds the conclusion to be “mind-boggling.”
A choice between embracing and rejecting modernity.
Propaganda vs. scholarship.
A “mind-boggling” ruling.
Could it because they lacked a national identity?
Reading the Torah and blowing the shofar.
The Israeli supreme court recently ruled on a case involving four Palestinian residents of eastern Jerusalem who in 2006 took positions in the Palestinian government on behalf of the Change and Reform party: an organ of Hamas. As they are not Israeli citizens—east Jerusalemites have a special status—the government responded by revoking their residency rights. The four appealed the decision to the courts and now, after nearly a decade, the highest court has ruled in their favor. Evelyn Gordon finds the conclusion to be “mind-boggling.”
Unlock the most serious Jewish, Zionist, and American thinking.
Subscribe Now