The Palestinians Have No “Right” to Territorial Concessions
A political, not a legal, question.
July 5, 2017
A political, not a legal, question.
Those demanding that Israel immediately “end its occupation” of the West Bank routinely make their case in legal terms: the Jewish state’s presence outside the 1948 armistice lines is “illegal”; Palestinians have a “right” to their own state in the West Bank and Gaza; the rights of Palestinians are being violated daily. Ruth Gavison contends that this approach, in addition to misapplying the principles of international law, misconstrues a political issue as a legal issue. (Free registration may be required.)
A political, not a legal, question.
A much greater problem for Israel, and for American Jewry, than the Western Wall controversy.
Thinking about the day after.
Evangelicals, Israel, and American Jewish politics.
Mark Zuckerberg’s plan for reviving civil society.
Those demanding that Israel immediately “end its occupation” of the West Bank routinely make their case in legal terms: the Jewish state’s presence outside the 1948 armistice lines is “illegal”; Palestinians have a “right” to their own state in the West Bank and Gaza; the rights of Palestinians are being violated daily. Ruth Gavison contends that this approach, in addition to misapplying the principles of international law, misconstrues a political issue as a legal issue. (Free registration may be required.)
Unlock the most serious Jewish, Zionist, and American thinking.
Subscribe Now