As Palestinians Continue to Suffer in Syria, “Pro-Palestinian” Activists Remain Indifferent
Why? Because their problems can’t be blamed on Israel.
January 21, 2020
It wasn’t about money.
This Martin Luther King Day saw the now de-rigueur exercise of using the civil-rights leader’s legacy to condemn the Jewish state despite the inconvenient fact that King admired Israel and despite the absence of evidence that he expressed sympathy for the “Palestinian cause.” In a previous article for Mosaic, Martin Kramer refuted those who argue that King’s opinions about Israel were “contradictory, naïve, or ignorant.” Kramer now takes on another, equally unsubstantiated, version of this argument: that King would have expressed his hostility for Israel but was afraid that doing so would cost him “financial support.”
Why? Because their problems can’t be blamed on Israel.
It wasn’t about money.
Four-million dollars is a small price to pay for ethnic cleansing.
Cora Wilburn’s Cosella Wayne.
Waving away the mountain to focus on the pebble.
This Martin Luther King Day saw the now de-rigueur exercise of using the civil-rights leader’s legacy to condemn the Jewish state despite the inconvenient fact that King admired Israel and despite the absence of evidence that he expressed sympathy for the “Palestinian cause.” In a previous article for Mosaic, Martin Kramer refuted those who argue that King’s opinions about Israel were “contradictory, naïve, or ignorant.” Kramer now takes on another, equally unsubstantiated, version of this argument: that King would have expressed his hostility for Israel but was afraid that doing so would cost him “financial support.”
Unlock the most serious Jewish, Zionist, and American thinking.
Subscribe Now