Why Is the U.S. State Department Backing a Lebanese Land (and Sea) Grab?
Demanding that Israel cede land in response to spurious claims.
March 6, 2018
Demanding that Israel cede land in response to spurious claims.
In recent weeks, high-ranking State Department officials have involved themselves in mediating territorial disputes between Israel and Lebanon. One of these disputes, writes Evelyn Gordon, is based on a real problem—the lack of a recognized international maritime boundary between the two countries—although the State Department’s proposed solution tilts unreasonably in Beirut’s favor. The other, however, is the result of a spurious Lebanese claim:
Demanding that Israel cede land in response to spurious claims.
The Obama administration also refused to act on—or reveal—direct eyewitness testimony it received of atrocities in Syria.
When leftists lose their favorite excuse.
And home to one of Judea’s last queens.
Marilynne Robinson asks what we are doing here.
In recent weeks, high-ranking State Department officials have involved themselves in mediating territorial disputes between Israel and Lebanon. One of these disputes, writes Evelyn Gordon, is based on a real problem—the lack of a recognized international maritime boundary between the two countries—although the State Department’s proposed solution tilts unreasonably in Beirut’s favor. The other, however, is the result of a spurious Lebanese claim:
Unlock the most serious Jewish, Zionist, and American thinking.
Subscribe Now