The UN Settlements Resolution Runs Contrary to Longstanding U.S. Policy and to International Law
Don’t believe Samantha Power and Ben Rhodes.
January 10, 2017
The UN Settlements Resolution Runs Contrary to Longstanding U.S. Policy and to International Law
Don’t believe Samantha Power and Ben Rhodes.
Ambassador Samantha Power, defending the U.S. decision not to veto Security Council Resolution 2334, stated that the vote was “fully in line with the bipartisan history of how American presidents have approached the issue,” citing alleged precedent from previous administrations. However, writes Peter Berkowitz, both her claim and similar statements issued by the presidential foreign-policy guru Ben Rhodes are demonstrably false; he outlines how the incoming president can undo the damage:
January 10, 2017
Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani Was No Moderate
He supported terrorism and advocated using nuclear weapons against Israel.
Why Did the British Prime Minister Vote against Israel? Virtue Signaling
She would have done better to exercise the power of veto.
The Golem Legend from I.L. Peretz to Pokémon Go and Everything in Between
Mindless automatons on the Jewish mind.
New Evidence of Hezekiah’s Anti-Idolatry Campaign
He built a wall, a tunnel, and a toilet.