International Opinion Should Invoke the Fourth Geneva Convention against Iran, Not Israel
Ignoring population transfer where it’s actually occurring.
December 23, 2016
Ignoring population transfer where it’s actually occurring.
Yesterday, the UN Security Council was set to vote on a resolution pressing for a “two-state solution” to the Israel-Palestinian conflict and condemning the Jewish state for a variety of sins, including “the establishment by Israel of settlements in the Palestinian [sic] territory occupied since 1967, including east Jerusalem.” As evidence that these settlements are illegal, the resolution cited the Fourth Geneva Convention. Egypt, which sponsored the resolution, withdrew it at the last minute. But this interpretation of the Fourth Geneva Convention remains widely accepted even though, as Dore Gold writes, it is based on a fundamental misunderstanding and directed at the wrong party:
Ignoring population transfer where it’s actually occurring.
And how Edward Said’s Orientalism gets in the way.
To condemn Israel, the New York Times unleashes the philosophers.
Obscure documents aren’t necessary to prove Jews’ connection to their homeland.
One from Italy, one from Russia.
Yesterday, the UN Security Council was set to vote on a resolution pressing for a “two-state solution” to the Israel-Palestinian conflict and condemning the Jewish state for a variety of sins, including “the establishment by Israel of settlements in the Palestinian [sic] territory occupied since 1967, including east Jerusalem.” As evidence that these settlements are illegal, the resolution cited the Fourth Geneva Convention. Egypt, which sponsored the resolution, withdrew it at the last minute. But this interpretation of the Fourth Geneva Convention remains widely accepted even though, as Dore Gold writes, it is based on a fundamental misunderstanding and directed at the wrong party:
Unlock the most serious Jewish, Zionist, and American thinking.
Subscribe Now